PAKISTAN’S POLITICAL MAP AND INDIA

PAKISTAN’S POLITICAL MAP AND INDIA:
It is not a new discussion over territorial disputes between the two nuclear powers. To understand the political-map dilemma lately surfaced after Pakistan changed its political map by exhibiting Azaad Jammu and Kashmir as part of Pakistan, history of Kashmir must be understood. It was an 86,000 sq mile area in the northern part of the erstwhile subcontinent. This geographical dispute was set about after British transferred powers to Muslims and Hindus in 1947. India, Pakistan and China geographically located near Kashmir claimed parts of Kashmir. Historically, Kashmir neither was part of Pakistan nor India and less discussed part of Kashmir which has been occupied by China i.e. Aksai Chin and Ladkh were also not parts of China but of Kashmir which was an independent princely state. India initiated this dispute by occupying 101,338 km, Pakistan controls 85,846 km area and China has control over about 37,555 km area.
After the partition, princely states were
allowed to either accede to Pakistan or India and or keep their independent
state intact. All princely states decided a side which they thought was
politically and geographically beneficial to them with the exception of
Kashmir, which was ruled by a Non-Muslim ruler but the almost the entire
population consisted of Muslims. Given the ibid intricate and complex nature of
Kashmir, none of the shareholder ever presented a viable and acceptable
solution and therefore every now and then are at war with each other.
The
role of UNO has remained been passive and ineffective in attending to Kashmir
question. UN’s resolution in favour of Pakistan’s stance on Kashmir has always
been countered and opposed by India and the same happens when India tries to
use its influence in legitimizing their claim over the entire Kashmir.
Likewise, China’s occupation of parts of Kashmir has been approved by Pakistan
given the political and strategic relations between the two and India never
accepted her claim. Similarly, other mediators like Shanghai Cooperation
Organization (SCO) could never come up with a viable solution of the subject
issue. Its member states including Pakistan and India and others having
geographical and political disputes with each other have never been offered
evenhanded resolution of their differences by SCO. Thus, SCO's role in
mediating, resolving and amending ties of its members states has remained been
ineffective and passive.
Thus, whether India and Pakistan went to wars over Kashmir, China and India got
into ugly border skirmishes over Kashmir or a third party ever wished to
mediate to resolve the issue, every time one important aspect of the issue has
been sidelined, ignored and intentionally put aside i.e. Kashmiris, the heirs,
the people on the receiving end. Since 1948, Kashmiris have never been heard
and asked about their wishes and what they wanted. Neither reshaping borders
lines, redrawing LAC or LOC nor coming up with changes in Constitution or Maps
will resolve Kashmir issue. IF the claimants wish to see a prosperous region
and have enhanced trade activities, Kashmir question needs an answer acceptable
to the people of Kashmir.
https://twitter.com/eatabook1987
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/sher.saheb
Comments
Post a Comment